Viagra/Sildenafil Citrate, Other ED Medications

There is certainly a lot of controversy about the use of Viagra and the side effects of recent unfortunate patients. However, in addition to the specific drug itself and its effects, causes and consequences, there is another controversy that only interested people will know. I am talking about buying and using imitations of sildenafil citrate.

The people involved are those who run a generic online pharmacy, through which they buy, at least tens of thousands of branches that sell them.

Have you noticed that I call sildenafil citrate instead of Viagra? This is Viagra, whether or not it mentions the original brand Pfizer(TM) or the generic version, it has always been because it is an introduction to the pharmaceutical industry, not to mention the public.

Although I fully respect Pfizer’s right to protect my brand, especially if I ensure that the domain name of the website does not register its “property”, I can’t, at least under the following circumstances, prevent this: in many cases Most people use the nickname Viagra or sildenafil to be part of our social and linguistic collection, rather than any deliberate attempt to use the name, albeit a legally suspicious way.

There are many examples where the original “trademark” or “commercial name” has become the most common means of identifying objects, products or other similar objects. Of course, the use of these trademarks and their combination with our descriptive language generally applies to the “first” or “original” of the article. As an Australian, I can’t give too many examples; I will only make sense to my compatriots. I only know a few examples, such as the example from the United States. UU or UK, but I believe everyone has their own ideas.

However, that being said, I believe that the core of the problem is not the “name” itself, but the use of the name Viagra to describe and promote generic equivalents, which are equivalent and supplied to the same component. Assets and whether they are manufactured and packaged with the care and control that most people in developed countries expect from these products.

The name “Viagra” belongs to Pfizer and can be stopped without a doubt or argument. However, the term “general Viagra” is used, if it does not represent the exclusive domain of the company or website, it is only a way of describing it to visitors and potential customers he proposed. For example, if I publish “Generic Levis,” people will know that I don’t sell Levi Strauss(TM) pants. The word “general” is very clear, and I am sure there will be no misunderstanding.

In fact, if there is a misunderstanding, it will benefit Levis(TM) because, although technically and in fact it is completely wrong, these credits are still “inferior” for many people. Of course, GM means “no brand name.” There is no reason to think that the word has the same meaning or that it used to mean anything else. In fact, for some general-purpose products, there is indeed a case where “general” has become “synonymous” as “not as good as the original”. I think of a lot of generic or “unnamed” food.

Not like this, using generic drugs. Or they contain a defined amount of active ingredient or they do not have them. If they don’t, they are not universal, they are fake! Forgery refers to forgery, but it is not universal. Generic terms mean “same but not original” (and usually much cheaper!).

As long as there is a dispute, the dispute may end for two good reasons. I anticipate that the issue will be resolved as soon as possible and subsequent legal approval for several generic drugs. After all, it has been going on for a while in the “generics” category. How many different brands (and unnamed versions) can you choose for aspirin or acetaminophen now?

The patent allows Pfizer(TM) to claim exclusive rights to chemicals by 2013; however, one of the patents that found its positive impact on impotence in the UK (Viagra was discovered).  first time). According to the trial report, the information on which the patent is based is already in the “public domain” when applying for a patent. EVET.

Whether the difficulty of this decision and other recommendations will affect Pfizer’s control of Viagra’s exclusivity remains to be seen. For those who need a product, unfortunately, these products are not in the financial sphere of anyone.